Weekend Reading on Women's Representation February 3, 2017

By Cynthia Terrell on February 03, 2017

groundhog2.jpg

​Dear all,

Groundhog Day. We all know the movie in which Bill Murray is destined to repeat the same year, year after year until he "begins to re-examine his life and priorities." This 'holiday' lesson seems especially relevant this year as those of us who care about women's representation are caught up in defending our rights, and the rights of others -  but I call on all of us to think about medium and longer term strategies that always will seem less urgent but are essential.

The Pew Research Center released a fascinating report about a 2015 study that tracks attitudes about gender equality across countries. Ninety one percent of Americans think that women's equality is 'very important'  - a full 26% above the median. Yet the United States ranks in 100th place for women's representation. How can this be? The answer lies in the lesson Bill Murray learned in Ground Hog Day. If we want different outcomes - and we now have the data that shows that 9 in 10 Americans want women's equality - we need to make different choices and pursue new strategies to elect women and get them into positions of leadership and power.

WomenRights_map.png

The Daily Beast reported on a study by The World Economic Forum that suggests that women will not reach full gender equality for 170 years.
According to a new study from the World Economic Forum, it will take 170 years until full gender equality is achieved. The review was based on education, health, political empowerment and economic participation. The latter two factors are the areas in which women fare the worst, the study found. “An average gap of 31.7 percent remains to be closed worldwide across the four Index dimensions in order to achieve universal gender parity,” according to the report. Notably, some regions of the world are closer to full gender parity than others.
Betsy Shea-Taylor writes a piece for the Sun Chronicle about the need to elect more women. While she acknowledges that better voting systems yield higher numbers of women she dismisses that topic as complex and goes on to say that women need to 'get involved' in politics, which, in sum, is the problem in a nutshell. Women are involved, marching by the millions, signing up to run for office in huge numbers but our political system is the barrier. Again, the Ground Hog day lesson...

Quotas and "multi-seat districts" are elements of those successes. Those concepts are too complex for explanation here; still, our woeful record begs review of our processes including the burdensome Electoral College established in 1787 as part of the Constitution.

That said, the prime impediment to the election of women may not be discrimination by men, as some would say, or our system, but the fact that women do not get involved in the same numbers.

Bustle has a great piece on The New Yorker's coverage of the women's marches - and its great Feminist Hero cover!

C3L6_4MWYAA2XM2.jpg

Huffington Post ran a nice story by Charu Sharma about companies which prioritize gender equality - I suspect there are others to add to this list. The Minneapolis Business Journal ran a good piece about 3M's efforts to put women in leadership positions in the company.

The Decatur Daily is tracking those listed to fill the U.S. Senate seat held by Jeff Sessions - one of the six is a woman.
Don't forget to tune in to PBS' To The Contrary!
If my tone is too impatient in this week's missive I apologize, I am feeling impatient for parity.

Cynthia

P.S. My grandmother was a charter member of the National Day of Prayer - and the Breakfast - she worked with women across political and international boundaries to build a better world. She and other women leaders are featured on this UN cookbook from the 1950s.

UN_cookbook_front_cover.jpg

UN_cookbk_back_cover.jpg

Show Comments
comments powered by Disqus

Join us in turning public passion for gender parity into action and results